An independent check of Pakistan's power plan · September 2026

Rethinking Power Planning
in Pakistan

A simple look at how much electricity Pakistan will need, when people will need it, and what it may cost. This dashboard independently checks the power plan approved by NEPRA on 11 September 2026.

Coverage: Pakistan excluding K-Electric Period: FY2024-25 – FY2040-41 Main case: Main demand + main solar/battery assumptions Author: Ammar H. Khan
226.0
Total electricity need, FY35-36 (TWh)
All electricity people and businesses need
110.3
Electricity bought from the grid (TWh)
FY35-36, roughly flat since FY25-26
30.0 GW
Highest grid need, FY35-36
compared with about 36.7 GW of usable supply
14.01¢
Estimated consumer cost /kWh
FY35-36, main exchange-rate case, before tax
16.5 GW
Possible power shortage, FY40-41
if batteries are ignored
The simple ideaBuild and buy only the power the grid actually needs at each hour — not the biggest possible number of power plants.
What this isNEPRA approved the official power plan on 11 September 2026. This dashboard is an independent check of that plan.
01 · The Big Finding

Pakistan's main power problem is not simply 'we need more power plants'

The harder problem is WHEN electricity is needed and WHO is still buying it from the grid. Rooftop solar cuts daytime grid sales. Batteries can move some of that power into the night. Air-conditioning pushes the biggest demand into a few evening and night hours. But old power-plant bills still have to be paid, even if the grid sells fewer units.

The biggest risk

People may use more electricity overall but buy less of it from the grid. If the grid has large fixed bills, fewer grid sales mean each remaining unit must carry more of those bills. Higher prices then push even more people toward solar, batteries and other options. Pakistan can therefore end up with too many contracted power plants and high electricity prices at the same time.

Why More Power Plants Do Not Automatically Mean Cheaper PowerTotal electricity need vs. electricity bought from the grid vs. electricity the main system must supply, TWh · Appendix N.1
What Electricity May Cost ConsumersUS cents/kWh, main exchange-rate case vs. 7.5% annual rupee depreciation · Table C08B

Five Things the Power Plan Must Get Right

A good power plan must deal with all five together · Table M35A

Simple Comparison — FY2034-35

This analysis compared with the approved ISP · M26A

02 · How Much Electricity People Will Need

First estimate how much electricity people need. Then ask where it will come from.

Do not start by guessing grid sales. First estimate total electricity use. Then subtract power supplied by rooftop solar and batteries. What is left is what people need from the grid.

The simple calculation (Section 13) 1. Total electricity need = cooling + industry + all other uses
2. Electricity bought from the grid = total need minus electricity supplied by solar and batteries
3. The main power system must supply grid purchases plus the electricity lost while moving power through the network
Total electricity need FY25-26147.2 TWh

All electricity people and businesses need, main case

Total electricity need FY35-36226.0 TWh

+53.5% over ten years

Total electricity need FY40-41280.9 TWh

People keep using more electricity overall

Share of total electricity bought from the grid75.2% → 48.8%

Falls from FY25-26 to FY35-36, then rises slightly to 50.4% by FY40-41

Three Possible FuturesLow / main / high total electricity need, TWh · Table M12
What Makes Up Electricity Use in the Main CaseCooling + industry + other uses, TWh · Table M14

Approved power plan vs. this analysis — FY2034-35

Annual Electricity UseTWh; coverage is shown · M25
Highest Power NeedGW; shows what changes when batteries are included · M26

2035 Comparison Table

Annual electricity use and highest power need in the official plan and this analysis · Appendix B

Assumed Annual Growth

Simple growth assumptions for cooling, industry and other uses · Section 16

Four Big Changes (Section 11)

  • Grid sales are no longer the same as total electricity use. People can use the same amount of electricity but buy fewer units from the grid because solar, batteries and private generation supply part of it.
  • The highest hourly demand and total yearly use no longer move together. A small change in the assumed daily pattern can change how many power plants seem necessary, even when yearly electricity use stays the same.
  • Cooling grows as more homes and businesses buy cooling equipment. It depends on how many air-conditioners and fans exist, how hot it is, and when people use them.
  • Solar helps least when the system often needs power most. Grid use can be lowest in sunny daytime hours and highest late at night, after solar stops producing.
Compare like with like

Two official cases use different annual electricity totals and different assumptions about how evenly power is used. So their 6.899 GW peak difference is not a clean comparison. If annual electricity use is held at the same 180.605 TWh, changing only the assumed usage pattern moves the peak from 35.547 GW to 28.635 GW. That is a 6.912 GW difference created by the assumption, not by people using more electricity.

03 · Air-Conditioning and Cooling

Pakistan's hardest power problem is increasingly the hot evening and night

Pakistan may have enough electricity over the whole year, but still struggle to have enough power during a few hot evening and night hours.

Highest actual demand23,817 MW

FY2024-25; observed at midnight in June 2025

Low-demand February average9,947 MW

Actual average

Estimated cooling-related peak13,870 MW

about 58% of the highest actual demand

Electricity used for cooling36.1 TWh

FY2024-25 · about 65% used from June to September

Monthly Electricity Use and CoolingAverage demand, highest demand and estimated cooling demand by month, FY2024-25 · Table M09B
Why the Peak Is Moving Toward MidnightHour when demand was highest each month, Jul-24 to Jun-25 · M17A
A Day in February, June and JulyHourly demand outside K-Electric, MW · in summer the peak moves to 11pm–midnight, when solar is no longer producing · Appendix L.6
How Cooling Demand Could GrowEstimated grid-level cooling peak in low / main / high cases, GW · Table M18
Cooling: Annual Use vs. Highest DemandCooling electricity used over the year (TWh) vs. highest demand (GW) · Appendix L.5

Two Ways of Estimating Cooling Appliances

Household-based estimate vs. whole-system estimate · Appendix L.1

As incomes rise, cooling use can rise quickly

When incomes rise, more people buy air-conditioners and refrigerators. That can make electricity demand rise quickly on hot evenings. The cheapest response is not always a new power plant. Pakistan should count how many cooling appliances are being added, estimate when they are used, and make efficient ACs and fans the standard. That can reduce bills and avoid building expensive capacity that is needed for only a few hours.

04 · Rooftop and Small Solar

Solar cuts daytime grid sales. Batteries can make that solar more useful at night.

Imported solar panels do not all reduce grid demand in the same way. Some are off-grid, some are connected to the grid, and the electricity they make can be used immediately, stored in batteries or exported. The model follows each step.

Solar panels working nationwide48.78 GWp

FY2025-26, total rated panel capacity

Grid-connected solar outside K-Electric32.00 GWp

after removing off-grid systems and K-Electric area

Electricity made by solar outside K-Electric42.95 TWh

FY2025-26 annual estimate

Solar panels imported that year9.76 GWp

FY2025-26 · may peak near 17 GWp of annual imports by FY2029-30

How Much Small-Scale Solar Could Be Installed, FY2024-25–FY2040-41Working solar nationwide, off-grid solar and grid-connected solar outside K-Electric, GWp · Appendix J.4
Past Solar Imports and PriceSolar imported (GWp) and estimated price per watt (US$/W) · Appendix J.2
Where Solar Electricity GoesUsed directly, stored in batteries or sent to the grid, TWh · Appendix J.5

From All Solar Panels to Solar Supplying the Grid Area

FY2024-25 compared with FY2025-26 · Appendix J.3

Registered Net Metering vs. Estimated Solar Actually InstalledGW / GWp; the two measures use different rating methods · M20A
Why official registrations miss some solar

The 7.319 GW of registered net-metering is only a minimum known amount for registered systems. It does not include every solar system, because many systems do not export power, are not registered, or are fully off-grid. The official 8.12 GW projection for 2035 is already close to today's registered number, so it likely misses a large amount of solar that is already physically installed.

05 · Home and Business Batteries

People buy batteries when the savings become worth the price

Battery prices are expected to fall as the technology gets cheaper around the world and Pakistan's market matures. Other costs, such as inverters and installation, are also assumed to fall over time.

Batteries in use FY25-265.0 GWh

starting estimate outside K-Electric

Batteries in use FY35-36108.6 GWh

before old batteries are replaced

Years to earn back the cost5.73 → 2.82 yrs

FY25-26 to FY40-41, simple savings estimate

Battery help counted in planning FY35-3610.1 GW

grid-level equivalent

Battery Price and Payback TimeBattery cells + inverter + installation, US$/kWh, compared with years to earn back the cost · Appendix K.3
How Many Batteries May Be in UseBattery energy outside K-Electric (GWh) and power from a typical 4-hour battery (GW) · Appendix K.5
How Much Batteries Can Really Help at Peak TimeBattery's rated power vs. actual peak reduction vs. amount safely counted in planning, GW · Appendix K.7

Checking Battery Imports Against the Starting Estimate

Reported battery imports compared with the model's starting estimate · Appendix K.1

One battery cannot do two jobs at the same time (Section 23)

If a battery is being saved for backup, it cannot also be fully used to lower the grid peak at that same time. The same battery power must not be counted twice. Batteries used by homes and businesses may naturally reduce grid demand. Batteries promised to the grid through a coordinated program must also prove they can respond when called. The model should count each effect only once. Pakistan needs simple rules that let many small batteries work together for the grid, so battery growth is planned for rather than ignored.

06 · What the Grid Will Actually Need to Supply

Start with total electricity need, subtract solar and batteries, and the remainder is grid demand

Once solar and batteries are included, the amount people need from the grid can look very different from a simple forecast of past electricity sales.

The dangerous price cycle

Large fixed power bills push grid prices up → high prices make solar and batteries more attractive → people buy fewer grid units → the same fixed bills are divided over fewer units → grid prices rise again. Pakistan can therefore end up with too many contracted power plants and high electricity prices at the same time.

How Much of Total Electricity People Still Buy From the GridElectricity bought from the grid as a share of total electricity need, %, FY2024-25–FY2040-41 · Appendix N.1
How Batteries Change Grid SalesElectricity bought from the grid and supplied by the main system, with and without batteries, TWh · Appendix M.1
Possible Range of Grid SalesLow to high range based on different demand, solar and battery assumptions, TWh · Appendix N.2

All 9 Demand + Solar/Battery Cases

Grid purchases (TWh) and highest grid power need (GW) in FY2030-31, FY2035-36 and FY2040-41 · Appendix N.2

FY2034-35 Comparison Using the Same Year

Section 25, M26A

07 · Can the Grid Meet the Busiest Hour?

Having many power plants on paper does not mean enough power is available at 1am

The main challenge is having enough power for a few busy evening and night hours — not producing enough electricity over the whole year.

Highest actual demand23,817 MW

FY2024-25

Highest grid need, FY35-3630.0 GW

vs. 36.7 GW fleet proxy

Possible power shortage, FY35-364.4 GW

if batteries are ignored

Possible power shortage, FY40-4116.5 GW

Falls to 1.2 GW with battery credit

Highest Demand vs. Usable Power SupplyGW, year-by-year estimate compared with usable power-plant capacity · Appendix N.1 & M.2
How Much Batteries Could Cut the Peak on a Typical DayOnly coordinated batteries vs. a wider well-coordinated pool, GW · Appendix M.3

A battery's size is not enough — how long it lasts matters

A battery sold as a four-hour battery can provide full power for only 3.24 hours after normal limits and energy losses are included. If part of the battery is kept for backup, the usable time becomes even shorter. A battery emptied from 6pm to 10pm may have nothing left for the 11pm–midnight peak. Planning should therefore test batteries that last 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours, including difficult days and different locations on the grid.

Typical-Day Battery Results — Full Detail

Available battery power, usable energy, actual use and peak reduction · Appendix M.2/M.3

How New Power Projects Are Classified

How the official decision labels each project · Section 29

08 · Why Electricity Can Stay Expensive

A plan is not truly low-cost unless it shows how many grid units will pay the fixed bills

Existing power plants have fixed payments. Those payments must be divided across the electricity units people still buy from the grid.

Old power-plant fixed cost per unit16.89

PKR/kWh, FY35-36, main exchange-rate case (22.03 if PKR falls 7.5% a year)

Total fixed system cost per unit22.68

PKR/kWh, FY35-36, main exchange-rate case (27.82 if PKR falls 7.5% a year)

Estimated consumer cost14.01¢

US cents/kWh, FY35-36, main exchange-rate case

Fixed payments to existing power plants1,862 bn

PKR billion, FY35-36, main exchange-rate case

Try the Numbers

Fixed Power-Plant Cost Calculator

Choose what happens to the rupee/projects and how much electricity the grid sells. The calculator shows how much fixed power-plant cost falls on each unit through FY2044-45.

Choose your assumptions
Fixed cost per unit = total fixed payments to existing power plants ÷ electricity sold by the grid. Source: Appendices F, G, H.

Fixed Power-Plant Cost per Unit, PKR/kWh

FY2034-35: PKR 15.33/kWh

Key Years

Try the Numbers

Total Electricity Cost Calculator

This adds an illustrative PKR 14/kWh for fuel, transmission, distribution and other costs. Now lower grid sales. The same fixed power-plant bills are spread across fewer units, so the price per unit keeps rising even though the total fixed bill has not changed.

Choose your assumptions
Illustrative total price = fixed power-plant cost per unit + PKR 14/kWh for fuel, networks and other costs. This is only an example, not an official retail tariff. It does not include taxes, subsidies or surcharges. Source: Section 40.2, Table C09.

Illustrative Total Electricity Price, PKR/kWh

FY2034-35: PKR 29.33/kWh

Total Price — Key Years

When grid sales fall, the price per unit can rise

If the fixed bill in FY2034-35 stays the same, the example total price is PKR 23.20/kWh; at 120 TWh it is PKR 29.33/kWh; at 80 TWh it is PKR 37.00/kWh. The total fixed bill does not change; only the number of grid units sharing it changes. Fewer grid sales therefore mean a higher fixed cost per unit, which can push even more customers toward solar and batteries.

Fixed Payments to Existing Power PlantsPast estimates + model projection, PKR billion · Section 31.1, Appendix F
Estimated Consumer Electricity Cost, Year by YearUS cents/kWh, main exchange-rate case vs. 7.5% annual rupee depreciation · Table C08B
How Lower Grid Sales Push Up Cost per UnitPKR/kWh at different levels of grid electricity sales, FY2034-35 · Table C09

What Inflation, Interest Rates and the Rupee Could Do to FY2034-35 Costs

Extra PKR billion and PKR/kWh if grid sales are 120 TWh · Table C05

Some Debt Payments Fall, but Other Costs Remain

Main cost groups, PKR billion, FY25 vs. FY35 · Section 31.3

Possible Annual Cost of the Transmission PlanAnnual cost, PKR billion/year, at different US-dollar financing rates · Table C07
09 · Comparing New Power Projects

Choose projects by what they add to the total system bill

An expensive project can still make sense if it reliably replaces even more expensive electricity. The right question is: what does it do to the total bill?

Cost to Build Different Technologies, US$/kWOfficial planning cost assumptions · Table 30

Official Cost Assumptions

Section 30, Table 30

What the Published Project Costs Do — and Do Not — Tell Us

A project's published construction cost is not the same as the annual amount consumers must pay · Section 30.1, Table 30.1

Planned Transmission Spending by TypeAlready planned vs. newly proposed spending, USD billion · Section 7, Table M07
New Power Plants in the Official PlanGW added through FY2034-35 · Section 6, M06
Try the Numbers

Could Existing Southern Coal Plants Be Used More?

Port Qasim, China Power Hub and Lucky together provide about 3,107 MW of dependable capacity. They generated 4.402 TWh in FY25 while carrying about PKR 302.619 billion of annual fixed capacity cost. Section 40.4.

Choose how much the plants run
50%
Fixed cost per generated unit = total fixed payments ÷ electricity generated. If the same plants generate more electricity, the fixed cost is spread over more units.

Fixed Cost per Unit Falls if the Same Plants Generate More

PKR 22.24 / generated kWh
Cheap-to-Build and Cheap-to-Run Are Not the Same ThingSimple example: one plant has lower fixed cost but higher running cost; another has higher fixed cost but lower running cost · Table C06
Who Should Pay the Extra Cost of Diamer Bhasha?

Under the official planning method, if a strategic project costs more than the cheapest system option, that extra cost is meant to be paid by the sponsoring government. The USD 3.0015 billion extra cost above the least-cost option should therefore not automatically be added to electricity consumers' power-plant bills — the cost still exists, but the government rather than electricity consumers would pay that strategic-policy premium.

10 · What Pakistan Should Do

Buy the power service the country actually needs, while keeping fixed bills and consumer prices under control

Practical Next Steps

Recommendations combine the official decision with findings from this independent analysis · Table M35

The Five Things That Must Be Fixed Together

Table M35A

11 · Full Numbers and Sources

All the main numbers in one place

Every chart on this page comes from the tables and sources listed here.

Main Numbers

Main demand + main solar/battery case · numbers are model estimates unless marked as actual or official

How to read these numbers

¹ Registered net-metering reported nationally in March 2026. ² Official ISP total for NGC + K-Electric; this is an official administrative number and is not the same as the broader estimate of solar physically installed. ³ The approved ISP ends in 2035. Demand, batteries and main-system supply exclude K-Electric unless stated otherwise. Fixed cost per unit is calculated by dividing the relevant PKR cost by electricity bought from the grid. Battery peak reductions are model estimates and should later be checked with a full hour-by-hour reliability study.

Sources Used

Main sources used in this analysis · Appendix A

The bottom line

Pakistan's main challenge is not simply the number of megawatts. It is when power is needed, how many units are still bought from the grid, and how much fixed cost must be paid.

Cooling is pushing demand higher at night. Solar is cutting daytime grid sales. Old fixed power-plant bills remain. Batteries are growing quickly outside the central plan. And new generation is useful only if the transmission network can deliver it. Pakistan therefore needs hour-by-hour planning that connects all five pieces, instead of planning mainly around the total size of power plants.